糖心视频

June 18, 2025

Where the wild bees thrive: Combining agricultural and environmental measures can offer more protection

Red-tailed bumblebee (Bombus lapidarius) on flowering meadow knapweed. Credit: Lisa Prudnikow
× close
Red-tailed bumblebee (Bombus lapidarius) on flowering meadow knapweed. Credit: Lisa Prudnikow

The global decline of wild bee populations is alarming. Landscapes characterized by intensive agriculture offer hardly any suitable habitats. Isolated local efforts are often not enough to counteract this loss.

Now, researchers from the Universities of G枚ttingen and Halle show that combining certain agricultural and environmental measures at the landscape level can offer more protection for .

Their findings show that combined with multi-year natural habitats鈥攕uch as meadows planted with long-lasting, 鈥攊s particularly effective. These two types of habitats together support significantly more wild bees than either does on its own.

The results were in the Journal of Applied Ecology.

The researchers analyzed the impact of three large-scale environmental measures in 32 : the creation of organic farmland; areas planted with flowers that bloom annually; and near-natural habitats using plants that return year after year. This enabled them to determine how different habitat combinations influenced wild bee abundance and .

They found that not every habitat combination is equally successful. The results show that many wild bees benefit most from a combination of organic farming and perennial, near-natural habitats. This is particularly true for wild bee species other than bumblebees. The reason: the areas complement each other by providing different food sources and nesting sites over longer periods of time.

Get free science updates with Science X Daily and Weekly Newsletters 鈥 to customize your preferences!

Bumblebees, on the other hand, benefit from both organic farming areas and near-natural habitats, regardless of whether the two occur together in the landscape or not.

A less successful combination, however, is organic farmland paired with areas filled with plants that flower annually. These habitats offer similar flowers as a at the same time, but no additional variety鈥攎eaning the positives do not increase the total benefits to bees.

"Our findings show that a well-designed mix of habitat types is key. When areas complement each other in terms of food and nesting resources, they can support a wider range of wild bee species," explains Kathrin Czechofsky, Ph.D. researcher in Functional Agrobiodiversity and Agroecology at the University of G枚ttingen.

Dr. Annika Hass, a lead researcher from the ComBee project, adds, "This study offers important guidance for shaping future measures for agriculture and the environment. It highlights the value of coordinated, landscape-scale planning."

The research is part of the , a collaboration between the Universities of G枚ttingen and Halle.

More information: Kathrin Czechofsky et al, Landscape鈥恖evel synergistic and antagonistic effects among conservation measures drive wild bee densities and species richness, Journal of Applied Ecology (2025).

Journal information: Journal of Applied Ecology

Load comments (0)

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread

Get Instant Summarized Text (GIST)

Combining organic farming with multi-year, perennial natural habitats at the landscape level supports higher wild bee abundance and species diversity than either measure alone. This combination provides complementary food and nesting resources, particularly benefiting wild bee species other than bumblebees. Annual flower plantings with organic farming are less effective due to limited resource variety.

This summary was automatically generated using LLM.