ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ


New mathematical models shed light on the mechanics of crystal defects

Seeking mathematical beauty in imperfect crystals
A dipole moment of positive and negative wedge disclinations—the "the other side of the coin" of a single edge dislocation indicated by the replacement of affine connections. The inverted "T" marks the edge dislocation, whereas the triangles represent the wedge disclinations. The curved lines depict the deformation field characterizing the metric generated by the wedge disclinations. Credit: Shunsuke Kobayashi, Katsumi Takemasa and Ryuichi Tarumi

Crystals are known far and wide for their beauty and elegance. But even though they may appear perfect on the outside, their microstructure can be quite complicated, making them difficult to model mathematically.

But there are people rising to the challenge. In an article this month in Royal Society Open Science, researchers from The University of Osaka used differential geometry to provide a robust, rigorous, and unified description for the mechanics of crystals and their defects.

In an ideal crystal, each atom is arranged in a perfectly periodic pattern. However, most crystals, upon closer examination, are not perfect. They contain small defects in their structure—a missing atom here, an extra bond there. These defects have important mechanical consequences—they could be the starting point of a fracture, for example, or they could even be used to strengthen materials. Understanding defects and their phenomena is thus very important to researchers.

"Defects come in many forms," explains lead author of the study Shunsuke Kobayashi. "For example, there are so-called dislocations associated with the breaking of translational symmetry and disclinations associated with the breaking of rotational symmetry. Capturing all of these kinds of defects in a single mathematical theory is not straightforward."

Indeed, previous models have failed to reconcile the differences between dislocations and disclinations, suggesting that modifications to the theory are needed. New mathematical tools using the language of differential geometry proved to be exactly what the team needed to address these issues.

"Differential geometry provides a very elegant framework for describing these rich phenomena," says Ryuichi Tarumi, senior author. "Simple mathematical operations can be used to capture these effects, allowing us to focus on the similarities between seemingly disparate defects."

Using the formalism of Riemann–Cartan manifolds, the research team was able to elegantly encapsulate the topological properties of defects and rigorously prove the relationship between dislocations and disclinations; previously, only empirical observations existed, and their rigorous mathematical forms were a mystery. In addition, they were able to derive analytical expressions for the stress fields caused by these defects.

The team hopes that their geometric approach to describing the mechanics of crystals will eventually inspire scientists and engineers to design materials with specific properties by taking advantage of , such as the strengthening of materials that is seen with disclinations. In the meantime, these results are yet another example of how beauty in mathematics can help us understand beauty in nature.

More information: Shunsuke Kobayashi et al, Revisiting Volterra defects: geometrical relation between edge dislocations and wedge disclinations, Royal Society Open Science (2025).

Journal information: Royal Society Open Science

Provided by University of Osaka

Citation: New mathematical models shed light on the mechanics of crystal defects (2025, July 16) retrieved 17 July 2025 from /news/2025-07-mathematical-mechanics-crystal-defects.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

An unexpected connection between the equations for crystalline lattice defects and electromagnetism

48 shares

Feedback to editors