ÌÇÐÄÊÓƵ

A research team from the Institute of Applied Ecology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has developed a novel framework to evaluate the soil microbial carbon pump (MCP), offering new insights into long-term carbon sequestration and sustainable soil management. The study, led by Drs. Liang Chao and Zhu Xuefeng, was in Soil Biology and Biochemistry.

Soil carbon turnover and stabilization are central topics in biogeochemistry, influencing both soil health and climate regulation. Advances in soil research technologies and theoretical approaches in recent years have reshaped the scientific understanding of how soil organic matter is formed and stabilized.

The concept of the microbial carbon pump is fundamental to this emerging consensus and emphasizes the role of microbial residues, known as microbial necromass, in forming stable soil organic carbon (SOC). Although research on the MCP's contribution to SOC has grown rapidly, direct evaluation of its carbon sequestration function has lagged behind.

Building on a three-phase framework (Reaction, Behavior, and Effect), the researchers concentrated on the long-term "Effect" phase of the MCP. They introduced a key indicator called ΔMCP efficacy, which quantifies the degree of synchrony or asynchrony between changes in microbial necromass and SOC levels.

For clarity, synchrony refers to situations where microbial residues and SOC increase or decrease at comparable rates, while asynchrony highlights mismatched changes between the two processes.

They then developed a comprehensive evaluation system capturing 13 possible scenarios of relative change between microbial necromass and SOC. Their findings suggest that simply measuring whether SOC increases can be misleading.

For example, SOC gains dominated by unstable, easily decomposed carbon may not ensure long-term climate benefits. By contrast, SOC accumulation driven by microbial residues points to a more resilient and disturbance-resistant carbon pool.

According to the framework, a positive ΔMCP efficacy (greater than zero) indicates stronger contribution of microbial necromass to SOC, reflecting higher carbon pool stability. Negative ΔMCP efficacy (less than zero) indicates either a faster turnover of microbial residues or an increasing proportion of non-microbial carbon sources, which could threaten the stability of the soil carbon pool.

The study reveals the importance of evaluating the quantity and stability of soil carbon in management practices. By distinguishing between stable and unstable forms of carbon accumulation, the MCP-based system provides practical guidance for policymakers and land managers. It enables the rapid evaluation of soil carbon practices to ensure long-term sequestration, which ultimately contributes to climate mitigation and sustainable agriculture.

The researchers emphasized that this results-oriented evaluation bridges the gap between theory and practice, enabling more precise soil carbon management strategies. Their contribution offers timely tools for enhancing carbon sinks during global efforts to combat climate change.