ÌÇÐÄÊÓÆµ


Decoding how pH controls the chemistry of clean energy

Decoding how pH controls the chemistry of clean energy
Schematic illustrations of: (a) the methods dealing with pH for the classic CHE model and the electric field (EF) pH-dependent model; (b) surface coverage on Pt (111) revealed by the electric field model: HO* dominates under alkaline conditions, while H* prevails under acidic conditions; (c) simplified pH-dependent activity volcano. Credit: Journal of Materials Chemistry A (2025). DOI: 10.1039/d5ta06105a

The pH, or the acidity or alkalinity of an environment, has long been known to affect how efficiently catalysts drive key electrochemical reactions. Yet despite decades of research, the atomic-scale mechanisms behind these pH effects have eluded scientists.

A new study sheds light on this mystery by decoding how electric fields, , and charge dynamics intertwine to govern catalytic performance. The findings mark a significant step toward rationally designing catalysts that perform efficiently in a range of environments, paving the way for next-generation clean energy technologies.

The paper is published in the .

Traditional models have explained pH-dependent activity mainly through the computational hydrogen electrode (CHE) model and the Nernst equation. These frameworks linked shifts in activity to changes in potential and proton concentration.

However, the new research shows that the reality is far more complex, involving a web of interfacial electric fields and molecular interactions that standard models cannot fully capture.

Recent advances in both experimental and have revealed that properties such as , polarizability, and the potential of zero charge (PZC) play a critical role. These factors determine how molecules and ions interact with surfaces, directly influencing reaction rates and selectivity.

Decoding how pH controls the chemistry of clean energy
(a-c) Electric field effects on the adsorption free energies of ORR adsorbates. Determination of the PZCs in M-N-C catalysts using an explicit solvation model: (d) illustration of the PZC calculation workflow; (e) the work function (WF) of materials in ion-free water is utilized to calculate PZC; (f) PZCs of the two typical M-N-C configurations: M-pyrrole-N4 and M-pyridine-N4. (g) Calculated 1D surface Pourbaix diagram and (h) pH- and RHE-dependent 2D surface Pourbaix diagrams. Credit: Journal of Materials Chemistry A (2025). DOI: 10.1039/d5ta06105a

By bringing together insights from electrochemistry, physics, and computational modeling, the research highlights how these interfacial effects manifest across a wide array of reactions, including hydrogen evolution (HER), oxygen reduction (ORR), carbon dioxide reduction (CO₂RR), and nitrate reduction (NO₃RR). These are among the most important reactions for renewable energy conversion, fuel generation, and environmental remediation.

"Our work shows that pH effects are not just surface-level phenomena; they are governed by the electric field environment at the interface," said Hao Li, a professor from Tohoku University's Advanced Institute for Materials Research (WPI-AIMR) who led the study.

"By understanding and modeling these fields, we can predict how catalysts behave under different pH conditions and ultimately design materials that are more efficient and sustainable."

The study also introduces advanced theoretical frameworks that go beyond traditional thermodynamic descriptions. Notably, the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)-referenced Pourbaix diagram and the pH-dependent microkinetic volcano model provide a more accurate depiction of catalytic activity and stability across varying electrochemical conditions.

Decoding how pH controls the chemistry of clean energy
(a) Scaling relations of the charge extrapolated Volmer, Heyrovsky, and Tafel transition state energies vs. H* binding energy. (b) Plot shows the adsorption energy of the intermediate HOO* plotted against the adsorption energy of the intermediate HO*. The scaling line (black line) has the equation ΔEOOH = ΔEOH + 3.2 eV. (c) EHO* vs. EO* scaling relations of M-N-C catalysts, metal, and metal oxides. (d) pH-dependent ORR volcanoes of M-N-C catalysts (left) and metal catalysts (right). (e) pH-dependent CO2RR volcanos on Sn-N-C catalysts (left) and polyatomic Sn catalysts (right). (f) 2D HER volcano considering RHE-scale surface Pourbaix (the orange triangles represent HER activity poisoned by HO*). (g) pH-dependent NO3RR volcano on pyrrolic M-N-C SACs (left) and pyridinic M-N-C SACs (right). Credit: Journal of Materials Chemistry A (2025). DOI: 10.1039/d5ta06105a

These new models offer scientists a powerful toolkit for predicting and optimizing catalyst behavior at the atomic scale. By integrating with computational simulations, researchers are now able to map how subtle changes in pH shift reaction pathways and determine overall efficiency.

Looking ahead, the research team plans to combine with machine learning potentials to simulate reaction conditions in real time. This approach could unlock even deeper insights into how catalysts evolve during operation, further accelerating the design of high-performance materials for a sustainable energy future.

More information: Songbo Ye et al, Decoding pH-dependent electrocatalysis through electric field models and microkinetic volcanoes, Journal of Materials Chemistry A (2025).

Journal information: Journal of Materials Chemistry A

Provided by Tohoku University

Citation: Decoding how pH controls the chemistry of clean energy (2025, October 22) retrieved 22 October 2025 from /news/2025-10-decoding-ph-chemistry-energy.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Data-driven approach identifies promising COâ‚‚ conversion catalysts

1 share

Feedback to editors